Prices via Intrinio. Supplier and customer ties are extracted from SEC filings and carry the sentence they came from. Not investment advice.
Prices via Intrinio. Supplier and customer ties are extracted from SEC filings and carry the sentence they came from. Not investment advice.
No intraday reading yet this session.
Greenfire Resources Ltd.
Price, suppliers and customers from SEC filings, institutional ownership and the next report.
54 institutional managers report a position in Greenfire Resources Ltd. worth $83.0M between them, filed on form 13F for the quarter ending 2026-06-30. 14 of them hold 80% of it, the largest being Moerus Capital Management LLC at 15.19%.
29 more managers in the register
14 managers hold 80% of the $83.0M institutional base. The other 40 hold the rest.
Positions as filed with the SEC for the quarter ended Jun 30. A 13F is due 45 days after the quarter closes, so this register is 78 days old and does not move with the price above it.
GFR (Greenfire Resources Ltd.) has 0 disclosed suppliers and 0 disclosed customers, strongest disclosure first.
Select a tie for the filing sentence that discloses it; select again to open the company. Lines are disclosed suppliers and customers, coloured by industry; the closer to the centre, the more the filings disclose. A dot is green or red by today’s move. Extended: satellites hang off single companies, not bundled sectors.
via Wexford Capital LP, Arrowstreet Capital, Limited Partnership, GSA Capital Partners LLP · 13.80% of GFR, 46.06% of TUSK
via Wexford Capital LP, Diametric Capital, LP · 13.80% of GFR, 37.55% of MOB
via Wexford Capital LP · 13.80% of GFR, 68.54% of NEPH
via Nokomis Capital, L.L.C., GSA Capital Partners LLP · 10.97% of GFR, 12.04% of CNTY
via Nokomis Capital, L.L.C. · 10.97% of GFR, 13.67% of ARKR
via Wexford Capital LP, GSA Capital Partners LLP · 13.80% of GFR, 9.98% of XGN
Managers holding a meaningful stake in GFR also hold this much of the other company’s institutional base. Managers who hold most of the companies we cover are excluded, because their overlap says nothing about this one in particular. This is how the two are held, not evidence that one moves the other.