Varamir
Desk
News
Calendar
Pricing
Saved
Search
tickers or companies
⌘K
Start free
· no card
Sign in
UL compared with MTB: revenue, margins and what each company keeps, and the suppliers and customers both name
UL
Unilever PLC
Change
Mkt cap
Revenue
Revenue
MTB
M&T Bank Corp
Change
Mkt cap
Revenue
Revenue
vs
Compare
UL
Unilever PLC
vs
MTB
M&T Bank Corp
Price
Mkt cap
Revenue
Revenue
Change
Change
Revenue flow
Supply chain
Price
Co-movers
Event sensitivity
Earnings history
Save comparison
Copy link
Supply-chain overlap
Desk
News
Calendar
Saved
Search
Supply-chain overlap
direct ties · both sides
Sources
›
direct ties · both sides
Only UL
2
PEP
PepsiCo
supplier
J
Jacobs Solutions
supplier
Shared
0
No shared counterparties.
Only MTB
2
LPLA
LPL Financial
supplier
MBUU
Malibu Boats
customer
Role chip = supplier or customer
Source: SEC EDGAR
UL
Unilever PLC
Change
65.27
· pre 65.73
Mkt cap
$142.3B
Revenue
—
Revenue
—
MTB
M&T Bank Corp
Change
220.21
· pre 220.21
· delayed
Pre-market
Sep 2 '83
Mkt cap
$31.9B
Revenue
$2.5B
Q2 FY26
Revenue
$9.7B
FY25
vs
Compare
Pre-market
Sep 2 '83
UL
Unilever PLC
vs
MTB
M&T Bank Corp
65.27
pre 65.73
Price
220.21
pre 220.21
delayed
$142.3B
Mkt cap
$31.9B
—
Revenue
$2.5B
Q2 FY26
—
Revenue
$9.7B
FY25
Change
Change
UL
65.27
vs
MTB
220.21
Pre-market
Sep 2 '83