Varamir
Desk
News
Calendar
Pricing
Saved
Search
tickers or companies
⌘K
Start free
· no card
Sign in
WHK compared with CDNL: revenue, margins and what each company keeps, and the suppliers and customers both name
WHK
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp.
Change
Mkt cap
Revenue
Revenue
CDNL
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc.
Change
Mkt cap
Revenue
Revenue
vs
Compare
WHK
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp.
vs
CDNL
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc.
Price
Mkt cap
Revenue
Revenue
Change
Change
Revenue flow
Supply chain
Price
Co-movers
Event sensitivity
Earnings history
Save comparison
Copy link
Revenue flow
Desk
News
Calendar
Saved
Search
WHK
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp.
Change
26.26
▼
−0.44%
· post 26.26
Mkt cap
$450.0M
Revenue
$29M
Q2 FY26
CDNL
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc.
Change
15.24
▼
−3.48%
· post 15.24
Closed
Oct 30 '26
Mkt cap
$657.7M
Revenue
$227M
Q2 FY26
vs
Compare
Closed
Oct 30 '26
WHK
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp.
vs
CDNL
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc.
26.26
▼
−0.44%
post 26.26
Price
15.24
▼
−3.48%
post 15.24
$450.0M
Mkt cap
$657.7M
Q2 FY26
$29M
Revenue
$227M
Q2 FY26
Change
Change
WHK
26.26
▼
−0.44%
vs
CDNL
15.24
▼
−3.48%
Closed
Oct 30 '26
Revenue flow
Supply chain
Price
Co-movers
Event sensitivity
Earnings history
Price
rebased to 0%
1D
1W
1M
3M
YTD
1Y
5Y
1D
1W
1M
3M
YTD
1Y
5Y
WHK, solid
CDNL, dashed
Supply-chain overlap
Revenue flow
WHK: latest quarter is a loss; flow not drawable.
Method
›
Supply-chain overlap
direct ties · both sides
Sources
›
direct ties · both sides
Only WHK
3
EQT
EQT Production
customer
RRC
Range Resources
customer
CNX
CNX Gas
customer
Shared
0
No disclosed counterparties: CDNL.
Only CDNL
0
None
Role chip = supplier or customer
Source: SEC EDGAR