Varamir
Desk
News
Calendar
Pricing
Saved
Search
tickers or companies
⌘K
Start free
· no card
Sign in
GRFS compared with WLK: revenue, margins and what each company keeps, and the suppliers and customers both name
GRFS
Grifols SA
Change
Mkt cap
Revenue
Revenue
WLK
Westlake Corp
Change
Mkt cap
Revenue
Revenue
vs
Compare
GRFS
Grifols SA
vs
WLK
Westlake Corp
Price
Mkt cap
Revenue
Revenue
Change
Change
Revenue flow
Supply chain
Price
Co-movers
Event sensitivity
Earnings history
Save comparison
Copy link
Revenue flow
Desk
News
Calendar
Saved
Search
GRFS
Grifols SA
Change
8.51
▲
+5.12%
· post 8.51
Mkt cap
$5.6B
Revenue
—
Revenue
—
WLK
Westlake Corp
Change
70.78
▲
+3.66%
· post 70.78
Closed
Nov 2 '26
Mkt cap
$8.7B
Revenue
$3.3B
Q2 FY26
Revenue
$11.2B
FY25
vs
Compare
Closed
Nov 2 '26
GRFS
Grifols SA
vs
WLK
Westlake Corp
8.51
▲
+5.12%
post 8.51
Price
70.78
▲
+3.66%
post 70.78
$5.6B
Mkt cap
$8.7B
—
Revenue
$3.3B
Q2 FY26
—
Revenue
$11.2B
FY25
Change
Change
GRFS
8.51
▲
+5.12%
vs
WLK
70.78
▲
+3.66%
Closed
Nov 2 '26
Revenue flow
Supply chain
Price
Co-movers
Event sensitivity
Earnings history
Price
Supply-chain overlap
Revenue flow
GRFS: latest quarter not drawable.
Method
›
Price
rebased to 0%
1D
1W
1M
3M
YTD
1Y
5Y
1D
1W
1M
3M
YTD
1Y
5Y
GRFS, solid
WLK, dashed
Supply-chain overlap
direct ties · both sides
Sources
›
direct ties · both sides
Only GRFS
3
HAE
Haemonetics
supplier
ADMA
Adma Biologics
customer
—
Nspo
unlisted
supplier
Shared
0
No disclosed counterparties: WLK.
Only WLK
0
None
Role chip = supplier or customer
—
= no ticker (unlisted)
Source: SEC EDGAR