ETN compared with VRT: revenue, margins and what each company keeps, and the suppliers and customers both name
Comparison · two companies, one scale
Track ETN
Watchlist prices, news filtered to it, and its next report on your desk.
Comparison · two companies, one scale
Watchlist prices, news filtered to it, and its next report on your desk.
Sign in to keep this comparison. A saved view records which companies, and which reading of them, then draws it again against a live tape whenever you open it.
Sign inThe shared column is the reading: companies both sides name in their own filings. ETN names 8 counterparties, VRT names 2, and none appears on both lists. A shared supplier is a fact each company filed separately, not a measured dependency between the two.
No counterparty appears in both companies' filings. ETN names 8 and VRT names 2, and the two lists do not meet.
Two filed statements on one plate. Each side is drawn as a share of its own revenue, so band length reads as margin, never as company size. ETN keeps 9.6¢ of every revenue dollar to VRT's 15.2¢. By revenue, ETN's quarter is 2.6× VRT's, a fact this drawing states rather than draws.
Standardized lines from each company's own filing. Both quarters end on the same day (ETN Jun 30 '26, VRT Jun 30 '26). The gap column is a margin difference in percentage points, never a price direction, so it takes no colour and no caret.